Sunday, April 20, 2025

Acute Endocrinology in Critical Care

 Acute Endocrinology in Critical Care: A Comprehensive Review for Residents

 Dr Neeraj Manikath ,claude.ai

 Abstract

 

Endocrine emergencies represent a significant proportion of critical illness presentations in intensive care units (ICUs) and require prompt recognition and management to prevent adverse outcomes. This review provides critical care residents with an evidence-based approach to the diagnosis and management of common acute endocrine disorders encountered in the ICU setting. We discuss diabetic emergencies, thyroid crises, adrenal insufficiency, pituitary disorders, and electrolyte abnormalities with a focus on practical management strategies informed by recent literature and clinical guidelines.

 Introduction

Endocrine emergencies constitute a diverse group of conditions that can precipitate or complicate critical illness. The stress response to critical illness itself often leads to significant alterations in endocrine function, creating a complex interplay between primary endocrine disorders and adaptive or maladaptive responses to severe illness. Critical care physicians must be adept at recognizing these conditions, understanding their pathophysiology, and implementing timely interventions to optimize outcomes.

This review aims to provide a practical framework for the diagnosis and management of acute endocrine emergencies in the ICU setting, with a focus on the most commonly encountered conditions and recent evidence-based approaches to their management.

 

 Diabetic Emergencies

 Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)

Diabetic ketoacidosis remains a common and potentially life-threatening complication of diabetes mellitus, particularly in type 1 diabetes. While mortality has decreased significantly over the past decades, it remains an important cause of morbidity and ICU admission.

 

 Pathophysiology

DKA results from absolute or relative insulin deficiency coupled with increased counterregulatory hormones (glucagon, catecholamines, cortisol, and growth hormone), leading to hyperglycemia, ketogenesis, and metabolic acidosis. Critical illness can precipitate DKA through stress-induced counterregulatory hormone release and inflammatory cytokines that enhance insulin resistance.

 

 Diagnosis

The diagnostic criteria for DKA include:

- Hyperglycemia (glucose >250 mg/dL, though "euglycemic DKA" can occur with lower glucose levels, particularly in patients on SGLT2 inhibitors)

- Metabolic acidosis (pH <7.3, bicarbonate <18 mEq/L)

- Ketonemia or ketonuria

Laboratory assessments should include:

- Complete blood count (CBC)

- Comprehensive metabolic panel

- Blood glucose

- Serum ketones (β-hydroxybutyrate is preferred over acetoacetate)

- Arterial blood gas

- Urinalysis

- Cultures and imaging as indicated to identify precipitating causes

 

 Management

The cornerstone of DKA management follows these principles:

 1. Fluid Resuscitation: Initial fluid deficit in DKA typically ranges from 5-10 L. Begin with isotonic crystalloids (0.9% saline) at 15-20 mL/kg/hr for the first hour, then adjust rates based on hemodynamic monitoring.

 2. Insulin Therapy: After initial fluid resuscitation has begun, start an intravenous insulin infusion at 0.1 units/kg/hr. Continue until anion gap closure, then transition to subcutaneous insulin with an overlap period.

 3. Electrolyte Replacement:

   - Potassium: Replete when serum potassium <5.2 mEq/L to maintain levels between 4-5 mEq/L

   - Phosphate: Consider replacement for severe hypophosphatemia (<1.0 mg/dL)

   - Magnesium: Maintain normal levels

 4. Bicarbonate Therapy: Generally not recommended except in severe acidosis (pH <6.9) or when accompanied by hemodynamic instability despite adequate fluid resuscitation.

 5. Transition to Subcutaneous Insulin: When DKA has resolved (glucose <200 mg/dL, anion gap normalized, pH >7.3), transition to subcutaneous insulin with an overlap of 1-2 hours with IV insulin to prevent relapse.

 Recent studies suggest that lower rates of insulin infusion (0.05-0.1 units/kg/hr) may be as effective as traditional higher doses while reducing the risk of hypoglycemia and hypokalemia. Furthermore, rapid acting insulin analogues administered subcutaneously every 1-2 hours have shown similar efficacy to IV insulin in mild to moderate DKA, although IV insulin remains the standard for severe cases or patients with hemodynamic instability.

 

 Hyperosmolar Hyperglycemic State (HHS)

 

HHS typically affects elderly patients with type 2 diabetes and is characterized by severe hyperglycemia, hyperosmolality, and severe dehydration without significant ketoacidosis.

 

 Diagnosis

Diagnostic criteria include:

- Plasma glucose >600 mg/dL

- Serum osmolality >320 mOsm/kg

- Absence of significant ketosis/ketoacidosis

- Profound dehydration

 

 Management

Management principles are similar to DKA but with several important distinctions:

1. Fluid Resuscitation: More aggressive fluid replacement is often required due to more severe dehydration. Initial crystalloid selection should be guided by serum sodium (corrected for hyperglycemia).

2. Insulin Therapy: Lower insulin doses are typically needed compared to DKA. Starting at 0.05-0.1 units/kg/hr is appropriate, with a focus on gradual glucose reduction (50-75 mg/dL/hr) to avoid rapid osmolar shifts and cerebral edema.

3. Thromboprophylaxis: HHS carries a high risk of thrombotic complications; early initiation of prophylactic anticoagulation is recommended unless contraindicated.

 

 Hypoglycemia in the ICU

Iatrogenic hypoglycemia remains a significant concern in critically ill patients, particularly during intensive insulin therapy. Hypoglycemia is independently associated with increased mortality in ICU patients.

 

 Management

Treatment principles include:

- IV dextrose 50% (25g) for severe hypoglycemia

- Continuous glucose infusion may be required for prolonged hypoglycemia, particularly with long-acting insulin or sulfonylurea overdose

- Octreotide may be useful in sulfonylurea-induced hypoglycemia

Current guidelines recommend targeting blood glucose levels between 140-180 mg/dL in most critically ill patients, as this range balances the risks of hyperglycemia with those of hypoglycemia.

 

 Thyroid Emergencies

 

 Thyroid Storm

 

Thyroid storm represents the extreme manifestation of thyrotoxicosis and is associated with significant mortality (10-30%) even with optimal treatment.

 Diagnosis

Clinical diagnosis is based on the presence of severe thyrotoxicosis with evidence of systemic decompensation:

- Hyperthermia

- Tachycardia out of proportion to fever

- Central nervous system effects (agitation, delirium, psychosis, coma)

- Gastrointestinal dysfunction (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea)

- Cardiovascular dysfunction (heart failure, hypotension)

The Burch-Wartofsky Point Scale can help assess the probability of thyroid storm.

 

 Management

Treatment must be initiated based on clinical suspicion without waiting for laboratory confirmation:

1. Anti-thyroid drugs: Thionamides block new hormone synthesis.

   - Propylthiouracil (PTU): 600-1000 mg loading dose, then 200-250 mg every 4 hours

   - Methimazole: 60-80 mg loading dose, then 20-30 mg every 6 hours

   - PTU is preferred initially due to additional inhibition of peripheral T4 to T3 conversion

 

2. Iodine solutions: Inhibit thyroid hormone release (Wolff-Chaikoff effect)

   - Start 1 hour after thionamides to prevent iodine utilization for increased hormone synthesis

   - Lugol's solution (8 drops q6h) or potassium iodide (5 drops q6h)

3. Beta-blockers: Control adrenergic symptoms

   - Propranolol 60-80 mg orally every 4-6 hours or 1-2 mg IV q4h

   - Esmolol infusion is an alternative for better titration in hemodynamically unstable patients

4. Glucocorticoids: Inhibit peripheral conversion of T4 to T3 and treat potential relative adrenal insufficiency

   - Hydrocortisone 100 mg IV q8h or dexamethasone 2-4 mg IV q6h

5. Supportive care:

   - Aggressive cooling for hyperthermia

   - Fluid resuscitation

   - Nutritional support

   - Treatment of precipitating cause

Plasma exchange or plasmapheresis may be considered in refractory cases unresponsive to conventional therapy.

 Myxedema Coma

Myxedema coma is a rare but life-threatening manifestation of severe hypothyroidism with mortality rates of 20-50%.

Diagnosis

Clinical features include:

- Altered mental status

- Hypothermia

- Bradycardia

- Hypoventilation

- Non-pitting edema

- Delayed relaxation of deep tendon reflexes

Laboratory findings typically show:

- Elevated TSH (except in secondary hypothyroidism)

- Low free T4 and T3

- Hyponatremia

- Hypoglycemia

- Hypercapnia

 Management

1. Thyroid hormone replacement:

   - Levothyroxine (T4): 300-500 μg IV loading dose, followed by 50-100 μg IV daily

   - Consider adding liothyronine (T3) in patients with cardiovascular compromise: 5-20 μg IV q8h

2. Glucocorticoids:

   - Hydrocortisone 100 mg IV q8h until coexisting adrenal insufficiency is ruled out

3. Supportive care:

   - Passive rewarming (aggressive rewarming can cause vasodilation and cardiovascular collapse)

   - Cautious fluid resuscitation

   - Correction of electrolyte abnormalities

   - Ventilatory support as needed

   - Treatment of precipitating factors

 

 Adrenal Emergencies

 Adrenal Crisis

 

Adrenal crisis is a life-threatening emergency characterized by circulatory collapse and electrolyte abnormalities resulting from glucocorticoid deficiency.

 Diagnosis

Clinical features include:

- Hypotension refractory to fluids

- Abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting

- Fever

- Altered mental status

- Hyperpigmentation (in primary adrenal insufficiency)

Laboratory findings:

- Hyponatremia

- Hyperkalemia (primarily in primary adrenal insufficiency)

- Hypoglycemia

- Eosinophilia

- Elevated BUN/creatinine

Diagnosis is confirmed with random cortisol and ACTH levels, followed by ACTH stimulation test once the patient is stabilized. However, treatment should not be delayed pending test results.

 Management

1. Glucocorticoid replacement:

   - Hydrocortisone 100 mg IV bolus, followed by 50-100 mg IV q6-8h or continuous infusion of 200-300 mg/24h

   - Transition to oral replacement when patient is stable

2. Fluid resuscitation:

   - Normal saline 1-2 L in the first hour, followed by continuous infusion guided by hemodynamic parameters

3. Vasopressors:

   - May be required despite adequate fluid and steroid replacement

   - Norepinephrine is generally preferred

4. Electrolyte management:

   - Correct hypoglycemia with dextrose

   - Monitor and correct electrolyte abnormalities

5. Mineralocorticoid replacement:

   - Generally not needed during acute crisis management (high-dose hydrocortisone provides sufficient mineralocorticoid effect)

   - Add fludrocortisone 0.1 mg daily once hydrocortisone doses are below 50 mg/day in primary adrenal insufficiency

 Critical Illness-Related Corticosteroid Insufficiency (CIRCI)

CIRCI refers to inadequate corticosteroid activity relative to the severity of a patient's illness, resulting from dysfunction at any level of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis.

 Diagnosis

The diagnosis remains challenging due to:

- Variable cortisol cutoffs in different studies

- Effects of hypoalbuminemia on total cortisol measurements

- Variable cortisol response in different critical illnesses

The 2017 guidelines of the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) suggest:

- Delta cortisol <9 μg/dL after cosyntropin 250 μg AND

- Random total cortisol <10 μg/dL

However, these criteria remain controversial, and clinical judgment is essential.

 Management

The use of corticosteroids in CIRCI remains controversial and should be guided by specific clinical scenarios:

1. Septic shock:

   - Consider hydrocortisone 200-300 mg/day in divided doses or continuous infusion for patients with refractory shock despite adequate fluid resuscitation and vasopressor support

   - Continue for 7 days or until vasopressors are discontinued

2. ARDS:

   - Consider methylprednisolone in moderate to severe ARDS

   - Initial dose 1 mg/kg/day, followed by gradual taper

3. Post-cardiac surgery vasoplegic shock:

   - Hydrocortisone may reduce vasopressor requirements and ICU length of stay

The ADRENAL trial (2018) showed no mortality benefit but faster shock resolution with hydrocortisone in septic shock, while the APROCCHSS trial (2018) demonstrated reduced mortality with the combination of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone.

 Pituitary Emergencies

 Pituitary Apoplexy

 

Pituitary apoplexy is a medical emergency resulting from sudden hemorrhage or infarction of the pituitary gland, often within a pre-existing adenoma.

 Diagnosis

Clinical features include:

- Sudden onset of severe headache

- Visual disturbances (visual field defects, reduced acuity, ophthalmoplegia)

- Altered mental status

- Signs of meningeal irritation

- Features of hypopituitarism

Diagnosis is confirmed with urgent MRI showing hemorrhage or infarction in the pituitary gland.

 Management

1. Hormonal replacement:

   - Hydrocortisone 100 mg IV q6-8h (priority - adrenal crisis can be life-threatening)

   - Thyroid hormone replacement if secondary hypothyroidism is present

2. Neurosurgical evaluation:

   - Urgent decompression may be needed for severe visual impairment or declining consciousness

3. Supportive care:

   - Fluid and electrolyte management

   - Correction of other hormonal deficiencies once stabilized

 Syndrome of Inappropriate ADH Secretion (SIADH)

SIADH is a common cause of hyponatremia in critically ill patients and is characterized by inappropriate release of vasopressin leading to water retention.

 Diagnosis

Diagnostic criteria include:

- Hypotonic hyponatremia (serum Na⁺ <135 mEq/L)

- Decreased serum osmolality (<275 mOsm/kg)

- Inappropriate urine concentration (urine osmolality >100 mOsm/kg)

- Elevated urine sodium (>30 mEq/L with normal salt intake)

- Normal adrenal, thyroid, and kidney function

- Absence of diuretic use or significant hypovolemia

 Management

1. Mild asymptomatic hyponatremia (Na⁺ >125 mEq/L):

   - Fluid restriction (800-1000 mL/day)

2. Moderate symptomatic hyponatremia (Na⁺ 120-125 mEq/L):

   - Fluid restriction

   - Consider vasopressin receptor antagonists (vaptans) in chronic cases

3. Severe symptomatic hyponatremia (Na⁺ <120 mEq/L) or neurological symptoms:

   - Hypertonic saline (3%) 100-150 mL over 10-20 minutes, may repeat 2-3 times

   - Target correction rate: 4-6 mEq/L in first 24 hours to avoid osmotic demyelination syndrome

   - Consider continuous infusion with frequent electrolyte monitoring

4. Treat underlying cause when identified

 

 Electrolyte Disorders in Endocrine Emergencies

Hypercalcemia

Severe hypercalcemia (Ca²⁺ >14 mg/dL) represents a medical emergency requiring ICU admission. Common causes in the ICU include malignancy, primary hyperparathyroidism, and medication effects.

 Management

1. Aggressive hydration:

   - Normal saline 200-300 mL/hr initially, then adjusted based on volume status

   - Enhances calciuresis

2. Loop diuretics:

   - Once adequately hydrated, furosemide 20-40 mg IV q2-4h

   - Increases renal calcium excretion

3. Bisphosphonates:

   - Zoledronic acid 4 mg IV over 15-30 minutes

   - Onset of action within 24-48 hours

4. Calcitonin:

   - 4 IU/kg SC/IM q12h

   - Rapid but temporary effect (48-72 hours)

   - Useful as bridge therapy

5. Glucocorticoids:

   - Effective primarily in vitamin D-mediated or granulomatous causes

   - Hydrocortisone 200-300 mg/day or equivalent

6. Dialysis:

   - Consider in refractory cases or renal failure

 Hyponatremia

Hyponatremia is the most common electrolyte disorder in hospitalized patients and is associated with increased mortality.

 Management

Management depends on the etiology, severity, and chronicity:

1. Severe symptomatic hyponatremia (Na⁺ <120 mEq/L with neurological symptoms):

   - Hypertonic saline (3%) boluses: 100 mL over 10 minutes, repeat up to 3 times as needed

   - Target increase: 4-6 mEq/L in first 24 hours

   - Maximum correction rate: 8-10 mEq/L in 24 hours and 18 mEq/L in 48 hours

   - Frequent monitoring (every 2-4 hours)

2. Chronic hyponatremia (>48 hours):

   - More conservative correction to avoid osmotic demyelination syndrome

   - Target increase: <8 mEq/L in 24 hours

3. Hypervolemic hyponatremia:

   - Fluid restriction

   - Diuretics

   - Treatment of underlying cause (heart failure, cirrhosis)

   - Consider vaptans in appropriate patients

4. Hypovolemic hyponatremia:

   - Isotonic saline to restore volume status

   - Treatment of underlying cause

 Glucose Control in the ICU

 

Glycemic management remains a cornerstone of critical care. Following the publication of the NICE-SUGAR trial, which demonstrated increased mortality with intensive glucose control (81-108 mg/dL) compared to conventional control (<180 mg/dL), most guidelines now recommend targeting blood glucose levels between 140-180 mg/dL in critically ill patients.

 Insulin Protocols

- Computer-guided or nurse-driven protocols based on frequent monitoring improve glycemic control

- Subcutaneous insulin regimens are appropriate for stable patients tolerating enteral nutrition

- Continuous insulin infusions are preferred for:

  - Diabetic emergencies

  - NPO status or variable nutritional intake

  - Hemodynamic instability

  - Liver failure

  - Significant insulin resistance

 Special Considerations

1. Enteral nutrition interruptions:

   - Reduce insulin doses by 50-80% when feeds are interrupted

   - Consider dextrose infusion during prolonged interruptions

2. Steroid therapy:

   - Significant hyperglycemia may develop even in non-diabetic patients

   - Insulin requirements often increase dramatically

   - Consider separate "steroid-specific" insulin dosing

3. Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT):

   - May reduce insulin requirements due to clearance of counterregulatory hormones

   - Dextrose-containing replacement fluids may increase glucose levels

 Conclusion

Endocrine emergencies in critical care require prompt recognition and management to optimize outcomes. A systematic approach to diagnosis and treatment, coupled with awareness of recent evidence and guidelines, allows critical care physicians to effectively manage these complex conditions. Future research focusing on individualized approaches to hormone replacement and targeted therapies holds promise for further improving outcomes in critically ill patients with endocrine disorders.

 References

1. American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2025. *Diabetes Care* 2025;48(Supplement 1):S1-S278.

2. Kitabchi AE, Umpierrez GE, Miles JM, Fisher JN. Hyperglycemic crises in adult patients with diabetes. *Diabetes Care* 2009;32(7):1335-1343.

3. Ross DS, Burch HB, Cooper DS, et al. 2016 American Thyroid Association Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Hyperthyroidism and Other Causes of Thyrotoxicosis. *Thyroid* 2016;26(10):1343-1421.

4. Jonklaas J, Bianco AC, Bauer AJ, et al. Guidelines for the Treatment of Hypothyroidism. *Thyroid* 2014;24(12):1670-1751.

5. Bornstein SR, Allolio B, Arlt W, et al. Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Adrenal Insufficiency: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. *J Clin Endocrinol Metab* 2016;101(2):364-389.

6. Annane D, Pastores SM, Rochwerg B, et al. Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Critical Illness-Related Corticosteroid Insufficiency (CIRCI) in Critically Ill Patients (Part I): Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) 2017. *Crit Care Med* 2017;45(12):2078-2088.

7. Venkatesh B, Finfer S, Cohen J, et al. Adjunctive Glucocorticoid Therapy in Patients with Septic Shock. *N Engl J Med* 2018;378(9):797-808.

8. Annane D, Renault A, Brun-Buisson C, et al. Hydrocortisone plus Fludrocortisone for Adults with Septic Shock. *N Engl J Med* 2018;378(9):809-818.

9. NICE-SUGAR Study Investigators. Intensive versus Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients. *N Engl J Med* 2009;360(13):1283-1297.

10. Rajendran R, Rayman G. Critical illness-induced dysglycaemia: diabetes and beyond. *Critical Care* 2014;18(6):701.

11. Spasovski G, Vanholder R, Allolio B, et al. Clinical practice guideline on diagnosis and treatment of hyponatraemia. *Nephrol Dial Transplant* 2014;29(suppl 2):i1-i39.

12. Carroll R, Matfin G. Endocrine and metabolic emergencies: thyroid storm. *Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab* 2010;1(3):139-145.

13. Chew MS, Itenov TS, Johansen ME, et al. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in sepsis: a retrospective cohort study. *Crit Care* 2019;23(1):336.

14. Rajasekaran S, Vanderpump M, Baldeweg S, et al. UK guidelines for the management of pituitary apoplexy. *Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)* 2011;74(1):9-20.

15. Boonen E, Van den Berghe G. Endocrine responses to critical illness: novel insights and therapeutic implications. *J Clin Endocrinol Metab* 2014;99(5):1569-1582.

16. Plummer MP, Bellomo R, Cousins CE, et al. Dysglycaemia in the critically ill and the interaction of chronic and acute glycaemia with mortality. *Intensive Care Med* 2014;40(7):973-980.

17. Gosmanov AR, Gosmanova EO, Dillard-Cannon E. Management of adult diabetic ketoacidosis. *Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes* 2014;7:255-264.

18. Dhatariya KK, Vellanki P. Treatment of Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA)/Hyperglycemic Hyperosmolar State (HHS): Novel Advances in the Management of Hyperglycemic Crises (UK Versus USA). *Curr Diab Rep* 2017;17(5):33.

19. Vellanki P, Umpierrez GE. Increasing Hospitalizations for DKA: A Need for Prevention Programs. *Diabetes Care* 2018;41(9):1839-1841.

20. Handelsman Y, Henry RR, Bloomgarden ZT, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology Position Statement on the Association of SGLT-2 Inhibitors and Diabetic Ketoacidosis. *Endocr Pract* 2016;22(6):753-762.

21. Yamamoto T, Fukuda I, Shibayama S, et al. Myxedema coma with high-output heart failure caused by rhabdomyolysis. *Am J Emerg Med* 2018;36(7):1324.e5-1324.e7.

22. Chiha M, Samarasinghe S, Kabaker AS. Thyroid storm: an updated review. *J Intensive Care Med* 2015;30(3):131-140.

23. Satoh T, Isozaki O, Suzuki A, et al. 2016 Guidelines for the management of thyroid storm from The Japan Thyroid Association and Japan Endocrine Society. *Endocr J* 2016;63(12):1025-1064.

24. Bornstein SR. Predisposing factors for adrenal insufficiency. *N Engl J Med* 2009;360(22):2328-2339.

25. Marik PE, Pastores SM, Annane D, et al. Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of corticosteroid insufficiency in critically ill adult patients: consensus statements from an international task force by the American College of Critical Care Medicine. *Crit Care Med* 2008;36(6):1937-1949.

26. Kavanagh BP, McCowen KC. Clinical practice. Glycemic control in the ICU. *N Engl J Med* 2010;363(26):2540-2546.

27. Marik PE, Bellomo R. Stress hyperglycemia: an essential survival response! *Crit Care Med* 2013;41(6):e93-e94.

28. Bagshaw SM, Bellomo R, Kellum JA. Oliguria, volume overload, and loop diuretics. *Crit Care Med* 2008;36(4 Suppl):S172-S178.

29. Verbalis JG, Goldsmith SR, Greenberg A, et al. Diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of hyponatremia: expert panel recommendations. *Am J Med* 2013;126(10 Suppl 1):S1-S42.

30. Greet V, Casaer MP, Mesotten D, et al. Severe hypoglycemia in critically ill patients: risk factors and outcomes. *Crit Care Med* 2020;48(4):e326-e334.

31. Fayfman M, Pasquel FJ, Umpierrez GE. Management of Hyperglycemic Crises: Diabetic Ketoacidosis and Hyperglycemic Hyperosmolar State. *Med Clin North Am* 2017;101(3):587-606.

32. Akirov A, Matveev V, Pinchevsky L, et al. Thyroid Hormone Replacement Therapy in Patients with Various Types of Hypothyroidism: A Systematic Review. *J Clin Med* 2021;10(17):3987.

33. Chaker L, Bianco AC, Jonklaas J, Peeters RP. Hypothyroidism. *Lancet* 2017;390(10101):1550-1562.

34. De Jonghe B, Lacherade JC, Sharshar T, Outin H. Intensive care unit-acquired weakness: risk factors and prevention. *Crit Care Med* 2009;37(10 Suppl):S309-S315.

35. Patwari PP, Carroll MS, Rand CM, et al. A defect in the arousal response to hypoxia in neurofibromatosis type 1. *Am J Respir Crit Care Med* 2010;182(12):1445-1457.

36. Burch HB, Wartofsky L. Life-threatening thyrotoxicosis. Thyroid storm. *Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am* 1993;22(2):263-277.

37. Danziger J, Zeidel ML. Osmotic homeostasis. *Clin J Am Soc Nephrol* 2015;10(5):852-862.

38. Umpierrez GE, Klonoff DC. Diabetes Technology Update: Use of Insulin Pumps and Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Hospital. *Diabetes Care* 2018;41(8):1579-1589.

 

39. Lam SM, Coates PT. Hemofiltration for hypercalcemia. *Kidney Int* 2003;64(1):367.

40. Zaloga GP. Hypocalcemia in critically ill patients. *Crit Care Med* 1992;20(2):251-262.

41. Dutt TS, Sadasivam B, Jenitha B, et al. A comparative assessment of adrenal function and cortisol levels in critically ill patients. *Indian J Crit Care Med* 2015;19(6):326-332.

42. Salluh JI, Shinotsuka CR, Soares M, et al. Cortisol levels and adrenal response in severe community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review of the literature. *J Crit Care* 2010;25(3):541.e1-8.

43. Wajngot A, Giacca A, Grill V, Vranic M, Efendic S. The diabetogenic effects of glucocorticoids are more pronounced in low- than in high-insulin responders. *Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A* 1992;89(13):6035-6039.

44. Garber JR, Cobin RH, Gharib H, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American Thyroid Association Taskforce on Hypothyroidism in Adults. Clinical practice guidelines for hypothyroidism in adults. *Endocr Pract* 2012;18(6):988-1028.

45. Marik PE, Zaloga GP. Adrenal insufficiency in the critically ill: a new look at an old problem. *Chest* 2002;122(5):1784-1796.

Fungemia in Critically Ill Patients

Fungemia in Critically Ill Patients: Diagnosis, Management, and Treatment Strategies

dr Neeraj Manikath ,claude.ai

Introduction

Fungemia, defined as the presence of fungi in the bloodstream, represents a significant challenge in critical care settings. The incidence of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) has risen dramatically over recent decades, particularly in intensive care units (ICUs) where critically ill patients with compromised immune systems, multiple comorbidities, and exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics create perfect conditions for fungal opportunistic infections. Candida species account for approximately 70-90% of all fungemia cases, though other pathogens including Aspergillus, Cryptococcus, and emerging pathogens like Fusarium are increasingly documented. This review focuses on current approaches to suspecting, diagnosing, and treating fungemia in ICU and critically ill patients, with emphasis on evidence-based strategies for improving outcomes.

Epidemiology and Risk Factors

The incidence of fungemia varies by geographic region, patient population, and hospital setting, but ranges from 2-11 cases per 1,000 ICU admissions. Candida albicans remains the most commonly isolated species globally, though non-albicans Candida species (particularly C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, and C. krusei) now account for more than 50% of isolates in many centers, with important implications for antifungal resistance patterns.

Key Risk Factors

Several well-established risk factors should alert clinicians to the possibility of fungemia:

  1. Prolonged ICU stay (>7 days)
  2. Broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy (particularly prolonged courses)
  3. Central venous catheters and other indwelling devices
  4. Total parenteral nutrition
  5. Recent abdominal surgery, particularly with anastomotic leakage
  6. Immunosuppression (hematologic malignancies, solid organ/stem cell transplant, corticosteroids, biologic agents)
  7. Renal replacement therapy
  8. Mechanical ventilation (>48 hours)
  9. Severe acute pancreatitis
  10. Colonization with Candida at multiple sites

The presence of multiple risk factors dramatically increases the likelihood of fungemia, with colonization at two or more sites conferring particularly high risk.

Clinical Presentation and Suspecting Fungemia

The clinical presentation of fungemia is often nonspecific, making early suspicion challenging. Classic signs include:

  • Persistent or recurrent fever despite broad-spectrum antibiotics
  • Unexplained deterioration in clinical condition
  • New-onset septic shock refractory to appropriate antibacterial therapy
  • Persistent leukocytosis or leukopenia
  • Unexplained thrombocytopenia (common in candidiasis)
  • Endophthalmitis (more common in candidemia than bacterial bloodstream infections)
  • New-onset renal dysfunction

A high index of suspicion is critical in at-risk patients, as early appropriate therapy significantly improves outcomes. Fungemia should be considered in any critically ill patient with risk factors who demonstrates persistent fever or signs of infection despite appropriate antibacterial therapy.

Diagnostic Approaches

Conventional Methods

  1. Blood cultures remain the gold standard for diagnosing fungemia but suffer from low sensitivity (approximately 50-70% for Candida species) and slow turnaround time (median time to positivity: 2-3 days).

  2. Fungal isolation from sterile sites (CSF, pleural fluid, peritoneal fluid, tissue biopsy) adds diagnostic value.

Risk Prediction Scores

Several scoring systems have been developed to identify patients at high risk for invasive candidiasis:

  • Candida Colonization Index (CCI): Ratio of sites colonized with Candida to total sites cultured; CCI ≥0.5 is associated with increased risk.

  • Candida Score: Awards points for total parenteral nutrition (1 point), surgery (1 point), multifocal Candida colonization (1 point), and severe sepsis (2 points). A score ≥3 has shown good predictive value.

  • Ostrosky-Zeichner Rule: Combines multiple risk factors including antibiotics, central venous catheters, total parenteral nutrition, dialysis, major surgery, pancreatitis, corticosteroids, and immunosuppressants.

Biomarkers and Molecular Diagnostics

Recent advances have improved diagnostic capabilities:

  1. 1,3-β-D-glucan (BDG): A cell wall component of many fungi (except Cryptococcus and Mucorales). Meta-analyses suggest sensitivity of 75-80% and specificity of 80-85% for invasive fungal infections. Sequential measurements may enhance value.

  2. Mannan antigen/anti-mannan antibodies: Specific for Candida infections, with improved performance when used in combination.

  3. PCR-based assays: Offer improved sensitivity (>90%) with rapid results, though standardization remains challenging. Multiplex PCR panels can simultaneously detect common Candida species and resistance markers.

  4. T2 Magnetic Resonance: FDA-approved rapid diagnostic providing species-level identification of common Candida species within hours, with sensitivity superior to blood cultures.

  5. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS): Rapidly identifies fungal species from positive cultures, significantly reducing time to identification.

Management Strategies

Empiric Therapy

Empiric antifungal therapy should be considered in high-risk patients with suspected fungemia. The decision to initiate empiric therapy should balance the risks of delayed appropriate treatment against antifungal overuse. Consider empiric therapy when:

  • Multiple risk factors are present
  • Patient has persistent/recurrent fever or signs of infection despite appropriate antibacterial therapy
  • Positive biomarkers (e.g., elevated BDG)
  • High Candida score (≥3) or other risk prediction score

Preemptive Therapy

Preemptive therapy refers to treatment initiated based on non-culture microbiological evidence (e.g., positive PCR or BDG) before definitive culture results. This approach has shown promise in balancing early intervention with antimicrobial stewardship.

Targeted Therapy

Once a fungal pathogen is identified, therapy should be tailored based on:

  1. Species identification
  2. Antifungal susceptibility testing
  3. Patient-specific factors (organ dysfunction, drug interactions)
  4. Site of infection and complications (endocarditis, endophthalmitis, etc.)

Source Control

Source control measures are essential and include:

  • Prompt removal or exchange of central venous catheters (particularly for Candida parapsilosis)
  • Drainage of abscesses
  • Debridement of infected necrotic tissue
  • Removal of infected prosthetic devices when possible

Antifungal Agents

Echinocandins (First-line for most critically ill patients)

  • Caspofungin: Loading dose 70mg, then 50mg daily
  • Micafungin: 100-150mg daily
  • Anidulafungin: Loading dose 200mg, then 100mg daily

Echinocandins demonstrate excellent activity against most Candida species, favorable safety profiles, limited drug interactions, and are recommended as first-line agents for critically ill patients with suspected or proven candidiasis.

Azoles

  • Fluconazole: Loading dose 800mg, then 400-800mg daily
  • Voriconazole: Loading dose 6mg/kg q12h x2 doses, then 3-4mg/kg q12h
  • Posaconazole: 300mg daily (delayed-release tablets)
  • Isavuconazole: Loading dose 200mg q8h x6 doses, then 200mg daily

Consider azoles for step-down therapy after clinical stabilization and when susceptibility is confirmed. Fluconazole remains appropriate empiric therapy in hemodynamically stable patients without prior azole exposure or colonization with fluconazole-resistant species.

Polyenes

  • Amphotericin B deoxycholate: 0.7-1.0 mg/kg daily
  • Liposomal amphotericin B: 3-5 mg/kg daily

Reserved for refractory cases, suspected resistant pathogens, or when other agents are contraindicated. Liposomal formulations offer improved safety profiles but at higher cost.

Other Considerations

  • Flucytosine: Used primarily in combination with amphotericin B for cryptococcal infections or severe invasive candidiasis. Requires therapeutic drug monitoring.

  • Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is recommended for voriconazole, posaconazole, and flucytosine due to variable pharmacokinetics and narrow therapeutic windows.

Duration of Therapy

For uncomplicated candidemia:

  • Continue treatment for 14 days after the first negative blood culture AND resolution of clinical signs of infection
  • Daily blood cultures until clearance is documented

For complicated infections (endocarditis, osteomyelitis, endophthalmitis, deep tissue infections):

  • Treatment duration typically 4-6 weeks or longer
  • Ophthalmologic examination recommended for all patients with candidemia
  • Imaging to rule out metastatic foci in patients with persistent fungemia

Prevention Strategies

  1. Antifungal prophylaxis: May be considered in selected high-risk populations (e.g., liver transplant, certain hematological malignancies, recurrent gastrointestinal perforations)

  2. Infection control measures:

    • Hand hygiene
    • Catheter care bundles
    • Antibiotic stewardship programs
    • Minimizing device days
  3. Risk factor modification where possible:

    • Early enteral nutrition over parenteral when feasible
    • Glycemic control
    • Judicious steroid use
    • Prompt removal of unnecessary invasive devices

Emerging Therapeutic Approaches

  1. Combination antifungal therapy: Limited evidence supports routine combination therapy, though it may be considered for severe infections with resistant organisms or refractory disease.

  2. Immunomodulatory approaches: Adjunctive therapies targeting host immune response, including recombinant cytokines and granulocyte transfusions, remain investigational.

  3. Novel antifungals: Several new agents with promising activity including fosmanogepix, ibrexafungerp, and olorofim are in late-stage development.

Conclusion

Fungemia in critically ill patients represents a significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Successful management requires:

  1. High clinical suspicion in at-risk patients
  2. Rapid deployment of appropriate diagnostics
  3. Early initiation of appropriate antifungal therapy
  4. Aggressive source control
  5. Appropriate treatment duration with monitoring for complications

A multidisciplinary approach involving critical care, infectious diseases, and clinical pharmacy is optimal. Future advances in rapid diagnostics and therapeutic options promise to further improve outcomes in this challenging patient population.

References

  1. Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes DR, et al. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Candidiasis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62(4):e1-e50.

  2. Kullberg BJ, Arendrup MC. Invasive Candidiasis. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(15):1445-1456.

  3. Bassetti M, Garnacho-Montero J, Calandra T, et al. Intensive care medicine research agenda on invasive fungal infection in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(9):1225-1238.

  4. Martin-Loeches I, Antonelli M, Cuenca-Estrella M, et al. ESICM/ESCMID task force on practical management of invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45(6):789-805.

  5. Clancy CJ, Nguyen MH. Finding the "missing 50%" of invasive candidiasis: how nonculture diagnostics will improve understanding of disease spectrum and transform patient care. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56(9):1284-1292.

  6. León C, Ruiz-Santana S, Saavedra P, et al. A bedside scoring system ("Candida score") for early antifungal treatment in nonneutropenic critically ill patients with Candida colonization. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(3):730-737.

  7. Timsit JF, Azoulay E, Schwebel C, et al. Empirical Micafungin Treatment and Survival Without Invasive Fungal Infection in Adults With ICU-Acquired Sepsis, Candida Colonization, and Multiple Organ Failure: The EMPIRICUS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016;316(15):1555-1564.

  8. Cortegiani A, Misseri G, Fasciana T, Giammanco A, Giarratano A, Chowdhary A. Epidemiology, clinical characteristics, resistance, and treatment of infections by Candida auris. J Intensive Care. 2018;6:69.

  9. Lamoth F, Lockhart SR, Berkow EL, Calandra T. Changes in the epidemiological landscape of invasive candidiasis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;73(suppl_1):i4-i13.

  10. Cornely OA, Bassetti M, Calandra T, et al. ESCMID guideline for the diagnosis and management of Candida diseases 2012: non-neutropenic adult patients. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18 Suppl 7:19-37.

  11. Bartoletti M, Pascale R, Cricca M, et al. Epidemiology of invasive fungal infection during sepsis: a multicenter prospective cohort study. Intensive Care Med. 2022;48(7):897-908.

  12. Arendrup MC, Perlin DS. Echinocandin resistance: an emerging clinical problem? Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2014;27(6):484-492.

  13. Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Shoham S, Vazquez J, et al. MSG-01: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of caspofungin prophylaxis followed by preemptive therapy for invasive candidiasis in high-risk adults in the critical care setting. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58(9):1219-1226.

  14. Koehler P, Hamprecht A, Bader O, et al. Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis and candidaemia in Germany: a five-year prospective nationwide surveillance study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021;76(7):1890-1899.

  15. Clancy CJ, Pappas PG, Vazquez J, et al. Detecting Infections Rapidly and Easily for Candidemia Trial, Part 2 (DIRECT2): A Prospective, Multicenter Study of the T2Candida Panel. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66(11):1678-1686.

Refractory Hypothyroidism

 

Refractory Hypothyroidism: Challenges in Diagnosis and Management

Dr Neeraj Manikath ,claude.ai

Abstract

Hypothyroidism is a common endocrine disorder affecting 4-10% of the global population. While most patients respond adequately to levothyroxine (LT4) therapy, approximately 10-15% experience persistent symptoms and abnormal thyroid function tests despite seemingly appropriate treatment, a condition termed refractory hypothyroidism. This review explores the definition, etiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management strategies for refractory hypothyroidism, with emphasis on recent advances in understanding and treatment approaches. We highlight the importance of differentiating between true refractory cases and those with poor adherence or absorption issues, along with emerging therapeutic options for patients genuinely resistant to standard therapy.

Introduction

Hypothyroidism results from insufficient production of thyroid hormones, leading to a hypometabolic state characterized by fatigue, cold intolerance, weight gain, constipation, and cognitive impairment. The standard of care involves thyroid hormone replacement, predominantly with levothyroxine (LT4), a synthetic form of thyroxine (T4). While this therapy normalizes thyroid function tests and alleviates symptoms in most patients, a significant subset experiences persistent symptoms and/or abnormal laboratory values despite seemingly adequate replacement, presenting a challenging clinical scenario termed refractory hypothyroidism.

This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of refractory hypothyroidism, examining its definition, prevalence, underlying mechanisms, diagnostic approaches, and management strategies, with particular attention to recent developments in the field and emerging therapeutic options.

Definition and Prevalence

Refractory hypothyroidism refers to the persistence of clinical manifestations of hypothyroidism and/or abnormal thyroid function tests despite seemingly appropriate thyroid hormone replacement therapy. The prevalence of this condition is estimated at 10-15% of treated hypothyroid patients, though exact figures vary depending on the criteria used for definition.

The condition can be subdivided into two categories:

  1. Biochemical persistence: Patients with persistently elevated thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) despite standard or high-dose LT4 therapy
  2. Symptomatic persistence: Patients with normalized TSH but persistent hypothyroid symptoms

Etiology and Pathophysiology

Medication Adherence Issues

Non-adherence to prescribed therapy is one of the most common causes of apparent treatment failure, estimated to account for 40-60% of cases of persistent hypothyroidism. Studies indicate that up to 40% of patients do not take levothyroxine as prescribed, highlighting the importance of addressing adherence before diagnosing true refractory disease.

Absorption Disorders

Gastrointestinal disorders affecting absorption represent another significant contributor to refractory hypothyroidism:

  1. Celiac disease: Present in 2-5% of patients with refractory hypothyroidism
  2. Helicobacter pylori infection: Reduces gastric acidity needed for LT4 absorption
  3. Atrophic gastritis: Impairs acidic environment required for tablet dissolution
  4. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO): Interferes with hormone absorption
  5. Inflammatory bowel disease: Disrupts intestinal absorptive capacity
  6. Post-surgical alterations: Gastric bypass, jejunostomy, or extensive small bowel resection

Drug Interactions

Several medications can interfere with LT4 absorption or metabolism:

  1. Absorption inhibitors:

    • Calcium and iron supplements
    • Aluminum-containing antacids
    • Proton pump inhibitors
    • Sucralfate
    • Bile acid sequestrants (cholestyramine)
    • Phosphate binders
  2. Metabolism enhancers:

    • Carbamazepine
    • Phenytoin
    • Rifampin
    • Phenobarbital
    • Estrogens

Genetic Factors

Recent research has identified genetic variants affecting thyroid hormone action:

  1. Thyroid hormone transporter defects: MCT8, MCT10, OATP mutations
  2. Deiodinase enzyme variants: Affecting conversion of T4 to T3
  3. Thyroid hormone receptor mutations: Causing reduced sensitivity to thyroid hormone

Increased Thyroid Hormone Requirement States

Certain physiological and pathological conditions increase thyroid hormone requirements:

  1. Pregnancy: 30-50% increase in requirement
  2. Aging: Altered metabolism and tissue sensitivity
  3. Obesity: Reduced bioavailability due to increased distribution volume
  4. Critical illness: Altered thyroid hormone metabolism

Diagnosis and Evaluation

Clinical Assessment

A comprehensive evaluation includes:

  • Detailed medication history, including timing of LT4 relative to food and other medications
  • Assessment of adherence patterns
  • Gastrointestinal symptom review
  • Dietary habits assessment
  • Complete medical history to identify comorbidities

Laboratory Evaluation

Core laboratory testing includes:

  • TSH, free T4, and free T3 levels
  • Anti-thyroid antibodies (anti-TPO, anti-thyroglobulin)
  • Celiac disease screening (tissue transglutaminase antibodies)
  • H. pylori testing when indicated
  • Complete blood count, comprehensive metabolic panel

Specialized Testing

For selected cases:

  • Levothyroxine absorption test
  • Thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) stimulation test
  • Genetic testing for deiodinase or thyroid receptor mutations
  • Gut microbiome analysis

Management Strategies

Optimizing Standard Therapy

Initial approaches include:

  1. Improving adherence:

    • Once-daily dosing
    • Medication reminder systems
    • Patient education on proper administration
    • Consistent timing of administration
  2. Optimizing absorption:

    • Administration on empty stomach (30-60 minutes before breakfast)
    • Separation from interfering medications (4-hour interval)
    • Switching to liquid or soft gel LT4 formulations

Alternative Treatment Options

Combination Therapy

Addition of liothyronine (T3) to standard LT4 therapy:

  • Typically administered at a ratio of 10:1 to 20:1 (LT4:T3)
  • Particularly beneficial for patients with deiodinase defects
  • May improve cognitive and psychological symptoms in selected patients
  • Requires careful monitoring due to risk of thyrotoxicosis

Novel Formulations

  1. Liquid levothyroxine:

    • Bypasses dissolution step
    • 19-31% higher bioavailability
    • Less affected by food and PPI use
  2. Soft gel capsules:

    • Enhanced dissolution properties
    • Improved absorption in patients with gastric pH abnormalities
    • Less subject to food interaction effects
  3. Parenteral administration:

    • Weekly or biweekly intramuscular injections
    • Reserved for severe malabsorption cases

Treating Underlying Conditions

  1. Celiac disease management:

    • Gluten-free diet improves LT4 absorption
    • May reduce LT4 requirement by 30-50%
  2. H. pylori eradication:

    • Reduces LT4 requirements in infected patients
    • Improves gastric acidity required for absorption
  3. Correction of nutritional deficiencies:

    • Selenium supplementation may enhance deiodinase activity
    • Vitamin D optimization improves immune function

Emerging Approaches

  1. Timed-release T3 formulations:

    • Provides more physiological T3 delivery
    • Reduces risk of T3 concentration peaks
  2. Thyroid hormone receptor modulators:

    • Selective activation of thyroid hormone receptor subtypes
    • Potential benefits in tissues expressing specific receptor variants
  3. Personalized medicine approaches:

    • Genetic testing to identify specific defects
    • Microbiome analysis and targeted probiotic therapy

Special Populations

Elderly Patients

  • Lower initial dosing and slower titration
  • Increased risk of cardiovascular effects with aggressive replacement
  • Higher prevalence of polypharmacy and drug interactions
  • Regular monitoring for subclinical thyrotoxicosis

Pregnant Women

  • Increased LT4 requirements (30-50%)
  • Adjustment typically needed by week 4-6 of gestation
  • Monthly TSH monitoring during pregnancy
  • Goal TSH <2.5 mIU/L in first trimester, <3.0 mIU/L in second and third trimesters

Critical Illness

  • Altered thyroid hormone metabolism during acute illness
  • Non-thyroidal illness syndrome may complicate interpretation
  • Consider temporary parenteral administration in severe cases

Monitoring and Follow-up

Laboratory Monitoring

  • TSH every 6-8 weeks during dose adjustments
  • Free T4 and T3 measurement in selected cases
  • Annual monitoring once stable

Clinical Monitoring

  • Symptom evaluation using standardized questionnaires
  • Quality of life assessment
  • Cardiovascular and bone health monitoring

Conclusion

Refractory hypothyroidism represents a significant clinical challenge requiring systematic evaluation and individualized management. Differentiating between true resistance and apparent resistance due to adherence or absorption issues is critical. Recent advances in understanding genetic and molecular mechanisms of thyroid hormone action have expanded therapeutic options. Combination therapy, novel formulations, and personalized approaches based on specific pathophysiological mechanisms offer promise for improved outcomes in this challenging patient population.

References

  1. Chiovato L, Magri F, Carlé A. Hypothyroidism in context: where we've been and where we're going. Adv Ther. 2019;36(Suppl 2):47-58.

  2. Jonklaas J, Bianco AC, Bauer AJ, et al. Guidelines for the treatment of hypothyroidism: prepared by the American Thyroid Association task force on thyroid hormone replacement. Thyroid. 2014;24(12):1670-1751.

  3. Centanni M, Benvenga S, Sachmechi I. Diagnosis and management of treatment-refractory hypothyroidism: an expert consensus report. J Endocrinol Invest. 2017;40(12):1289-1301.

  4. Virili C, Antonelli A, Santaguida MG, Benvenga S, Centanni M. Gastrointestinal malabsorption of thyroxine. Endocr Rev. 2019;40(1):118-136.

  5. McMillan M, Rotenberg KS, Vora K, et al. Comorbidities, concomitant medications, and diet as factors affecting levothyroxine therapy: results of the CONTROL Surveillance Project. Drugs R D. 2016;16(1):53-68.

  6. Guglielmi R, Grimaldi F, Negro R, et al. Shift from levothyroxine tablets to liquid formulation at breakfast improves quality of life of hypothyroid patients. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2018;18(3):235-240.

  7. Fallahi P, Ferrari SM, Ruffilli I, et al. Advancements in the treatment of hypothyroidism with L-T4 liquid formulation or soft gel capsule: an update. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2017;14(5):647-655.

  8. Gonzalez-Aguilera B, Betea D, Lutteri L, Cavalier E, Geenen V, Beckers A. Conversion to soft gel capsule formulation of levothyroxine improves the management of hypothyroidism. J Endocrinol Invest. 2018;41(5):549-553.

  9. Panicker V, Saravanan P, Vaidya B, et al. Common variation in the DIO2 gene predicts baseline psychological well-being and response to combination thyroxine plus triiodothyronine therapy in hypothyroid patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(5):1623-1629.

  10. Wiersinga WM. Paradigm shifts in thyroid hormone replacement therapies for hypothyroidism. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014;10(3):164-174.

  11. Livadas S, Bothou C, Androulakis I, et al. Levothyroxine replacement therapy and overuse: a timely diagnostic approach. Thyroid. 2018;28(11):1580-1590.

  12. Peterson SJ, Cappola AR, Castro MR, et al. An online survey of hypothyroid patients demonstrates prominent dissatisfaction. Thyroid. 2018;28(6):707-721.

  13. Hennessey JV, Espaillat R. Current evidence for the treatment of hypothyroidism with levothyroxine/liothyronine combination therapy versus levothyroxine monotherapy. Int J Clin Pract. 2018;72(2):e13062.

  14. Virili C, Stramazzo I, Santaguida MG, Bruno G, Brusca N, Capriello S, Cellini M, Severi C, Centanni M. Ulcerative colitis as a novel cause of increased need for levothyroxine. Front Endocrinol. 2020;11:37.

  15. Taylor PN, Iqbal A, Minassian C, et al. Falling threshold for treatment of borderline elevated thyrotropin levels—balancing benefits and risks: evidence from a large community-based study. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(1):32-39.

  16. Hoermann R, Midgley JEM, Larisch R, Dietrich JW. Individualised requirements for optimum treatment of hypothyroidism: complex needs, limited options. Drugs Context. 2019;8:212597.

  17. Zhu X, Cheng SY. New insights into regulation of lipid metabolism by thyroid hormone. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2010;17(5):408-413.

  18. Benvenga S, Carlé A, Fliers E, et al. Central hypothyroidism: a neglected thyroid disorder. Front Endocrinol. 2021;12:627980.

  19. Chaker L, Bianco AC, Jonklaas J, Peeters RP. Hypothyroidism. Lancet. 2017;390(10101):1550-1562.

  20. Biondi B, Wartofsky L. Treatment with thyroid hormone. Endocr Rev. 2014;35(3):433-512.

Circadian Rhythm Management in the ICU

 

Circadian Rhythm Management in the ICU: A Comprehensive Review

Dr Neeraj Manikath ,Claude.ai

Abstract

Intensive care units (ICUs) present unique challenges to patients' circadian rhythms due to continuous monitoring, round-the-clock interventions, and environmental factors that disrupt normal sleep-wake cycles. Circadian rhythm disruption has been associated with delirium, prolonged ICU stays, immunosuppression, and poorer overall outcomes. This review examines the current understanding of circadian biology in critical care settings, explores the impact of circadian disruption on patient outcomes, and evaluates evidence-based interventions to preserve and restore normal circadian function. Recent advances in chronotherapeutics, environmental modifications, and pharmacological approaches are discussed, along with practical implementation strategies for ICU settings. Maintaining circadian integrity represents an important yet underutilized approach to improving outcomes in critically ill patients.

Keywords: circadian rhythm, critical care, delirium, light exposure, melatonin, sleep promotion, chronotherapeutics

Introduction

Circadian rhythms—endogenous, entrainable oscillations in physiological processes with approximately 24-hour periodicity—play fundamental roles in human health and disease recovery. They regulate sleep-wake cycles, hormonal secretion, immune function, metabolism, core body temperature, and numerous other physiological processes essential for homeostasis and recovery from illness (Tahara & Shibata, 2018). The master circadian pacemaker resides in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus, which synchronizes peripheral clocks throughout the body's tissues and organs.

In intensive care unit (ICU) environments, patients face multiple challenges to circadian integrity: continuous artificial lighting, noise, frequent care interventions, mechanical ventilation, sedation, and the underlying critical illness itself. These factors contribute to what has been termed "ICU syndrome," characterized by sleep fragmentation, delirium, and cognitive dysfunction (Pisani & D'Ambrosio, 2020). Growing evidence suggests that circadian disruption may not merely be a consequence of critical illness but may actively contribute to adverse outcomes, prolonged recovery, and increased mortality.

This review examines the current understanding of circadian biology in critical care environments, the consequences of circadian disruption, and evidence-based interventions aimed at preserving and restoring normal circadian function in ICU patients.

Circadian Biology and Pathophysiology in Critical Illness

Molecular Mechanisms of Circadian Rhythm

At the molecular level, circadian rhythms are generated by transcriptional-translational feedback loops involving "clock genes" such as CLOCK, BMAL1, PER, and CRY (Takahashi, 2017). These genes regulate the expression of numerous clock-controlled genes that mediate physiological processes throughout the body. In critical illness, both the master clock in the SCN and peripheral clocks can become desynchronized due to inflammatory mediators, metabolic derangements, and external zeitgebers (time cues) such as light, feeding schedules, and medication administration (McKenna et al., 2020).

Disruption of Melatonin and Cortisol Secretion

Melatonin and cortisol represent key circadian markers whose disruption has been well-documented in ICU settings. Under normal conditions, melatonin secretion peaks during nighttime hours, promoting sleep initiation and maintenance, while cortisol follows a diurnal pattern with peak levels in early morning hours. Studies have consistently demonstrated abnormal melatonin profiles in critically ill patients, characterized by blunted nocturnal peaks, daytime secretion, or complete abolishment of rhythmicity (Mundigler et al., 2002; Olofsson et al., 2004).

Similarly, the cortisol rhythm often becomes disrupted or inverted in critically ill patients. These hormonal alterations have been associated with sleep disruption, inflammatory dysregulation, and metabolic disturbances that may impede recovery (Pisani et al., 2015).

Impact on Sleep Architecture

ICU patients commonly experience profound sleep disruption characterized by frequent awakenings, reduced slow-wave and REM sleep, and increased sleep fragmentation (Freedman et al., 2001). Polysomnographic studies reveal that ICU patients may experience as many as 20-60 awakenings per hour and spend a substantial portion of their "sleep" time in superficial Stage 1 sleep rather than restorative slow-wave sleep (Friese, 2008). This sleep disruption correlates with inflammation, impaired immune function, and neuropsychiatric complications including delirium.

Clinical Consequences of Circadian Disruption in the ICU

Delirium

Delirium—an acute confusional state characterized by fluctuating mental status, inattention, and disorganized thinking—affects up to 80% of mechanically ventilated ICU patients and is associated with increased mortality, prolonged hospitalization, and long-term cognitive impairment (Ely et al., 2004). Circadian disruption is increasingly recognized as both a contributor to and consequence of delirium, creating a potentially harmful cycle. Loss of normal sleep-wake cycling often precedes delirium onset, and interventions targeting circadian restoration have shown promise in reducing delirium incidence (Van Rompaey et al., 2012).

Immune Dysfunction

The immune system exhibits strong circadian oscillations in cellular function, cytokine production, and leukocyte trafficking (Scheiermann et al., 2018). Disruption of these rhythms may compromise host defense and exacerbate inflammatory responses. Several studies have demonstrated associations between circadian disruption and increased susceptibility to infection, prolonged inflammatory states, and poorer outcomes in sepsis (Haspel et al., 2020).

Metabolic Derangements

Metabolism is tightly regulated by circadian clocks, with disruption linked to insulin resistance, altered glucose metabolism, and dyslipidemia (Panda, 2016). In critically ill patients, loss of circadian integrity may exacerbate metabolic dysregulation, potentially complicating nutritional support and glycemic control (Vetter et al., 2018).

Cardiovascular Instability

Blood pressure, heart rate, vascular tone, and thrombotic tendency all exhibit circadian variation (Thosar et al., 2018). Loss of these rhythms may contribute to hemodynamic instability, increased arrhythmia risk, and adverse cardiovascular events. Indeed, studies have documented increased cardiac events during periods of circadian misalignment (Portaluppi et al., 2012).

Assessment of Circadian Rhythms in ICU Settings

Objective Measures

Several methodologies are available for objective assessment of circadian rhythms in ICU patients:

  1. Melatonin Measurement: Serial measurements of plasma melatonin or urinary 6-sulfatoxymelatonin (aMT6s) provide direct assessment of melatonin secretion patterns. However, practical limitations include cost, availability of assays, and potential interference from medications (Benloucif et al., 2008).
  2. Cortisol Patterns: Salivary or plasma cortisol measurements can reveal disruption of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis rhythm, though interpretation may be complicated by exogenous steroid administration and stress responses (Maas et al., 2021).
  3. Core Body Temperature Monitoring: Continuous temperature monitoring can detect loss of normal circadian temperature variation, typically characterized by nighttime decreases of 0.5-1°C (Drewry et al., 2013).
  4. Actigraphy: Wrist-worn accelerometers can provide non-invasive, continuous assessment of rest-activity patterns, offering insights into sleep fragmentation and circadian disruption (Schwab et al., 2018).

Subjective and Observational Assessments

While less precise than objective measures, several clinical observations may suggest circadian disruption:

  1. Sleep-Wake Pattern Documentation: Nursing documentation of patient sleep and wake periods can reveal inconsistent patterns or day-night reversal.
  2. Delirium Assessment Tools: The Confusion Assessment Method for ICU (CAM-ICU) and Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) can detect fluctuations in mental status consistent with circadian disruption (Gusmao-Flores et al., 2012).
  3. Patient Self-Reports: When possible, patient reports of sleep quality, nighttime confusion, or disorientation to time may suggest circadian disruption.

Evidence-Based Interventions for Circadian Rhythm Management

Environmental Modifications

Light Management

Light represents the most powerful zeitgeber for circadian entrainment. Evidence supports several lighting interventions:

  1. Dynamic Lighting Systems: ICUs equipped with programmable lighting systems that mimic natural daylight patterns (bright blue-enriched light during daytime, dimmer amber light during evening) have demonstrated improvements in circadian alignment and reduced delirium (Engwall et al., 2015; Simons et al., 2016).
  2. Light Therapy: Strategic exposure to bright light (~10,000 lux) for 30-120 minutes in morning hours can help reset disrupted circadian rhythms and improve sleep quality (Ono et al., 2011).
  3. Blue Light Reduction: Filtering blue wavelengths through amber glasses or screen filters during evening hours reduces melatonin suppression and may improve sleep onset (Figueiro et al., 2018).

Noise Reduction

Excessive noise disrupts sleep architecture and contributes to circadian disruption. Evidence-based approaches include:

  1. Acoustic Modifications: Sound-absorbing materials, closed patient rooms, and reduced alarm volumes can decrease ambient noise below the WHO-recommended 30-35 dB for nighttime hospital settings (Darbyshire & Young, 2013).
  2. Clustered Care Activities: Consolidating nursing interventions to minimize nighttime disruptions allows for longer periods of uninterrupted sleep (Patel et al., 2014).
  3. Earplugs and Noise Masking: Providing earplugs or white noise machines can improve subjective sleep quality and may reduce delirium incidence (Van Rompaey et al., 2012).

Pharmacological Approaches

Melatonin and Melatonin Receptor Agonists

  1. Exogenous Melatonin: Administration of 3-10 mg melatonin in evening hours has shown promise for improving sleep quality and reducing delirium in ICU patients (Nishikimi et al., 2018). Timing is crucial, with administration 1-2 hours before desired sleep onset maximizing effectiveness.
  2. Ramelteon: This selective melatonin receptor agonist has demonstrated efficacy in reducing delirium incidence when administered nightly (4-8 mg) (Hatta et al., 2014).

Judicious Sedation Management

  1. Minimizing Benzodiazepines: While often used for sedation, benzodiazepines suppress slow-wave sleep and REM sleep, potentially exacerbating circadian disruption (Weinhouse et al., 2009).
  2. Dexmedetomidine: This α2-adrenergic agonist produces sedation that more closely resembles natural sleep, with preservation of slow-wave and REM sleep architecture compared to GABA-ergic sedatives (Sanders & Maze, 2012).
  3. Propofol: When sedation is necessary, propofol may have advantages over benzodiazepines in maintaining sleep architecture, although it still suppresses slow-wave sleep (Kondili et al., 2012).

Chronotherapeutic Approaches

Chronotherapeutics—the strategic timing of interventions to align with circadian rhythms—represents an emerging approach in critical care:

  1. Timed Medication Administration: Administering medications in accordance with circadian-dependent pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics may improve efficacy and reduce adverse effects (Selfridge et al., 2016).
  2. Feeding Schedules: Time-restricted feeding that aligns with natural circadian eating patterns (primarily daytime) may improve metabolic outcomes and help entrain peripheral clocks (Sutton et al., 2018).
  3. Physical Therapy Timing: Scheduling mobilization and rehabilitation activities during daytime hours reinforces circadian cues and may improve sleep quality (Kamdar et al., 2013).

Multicomponent Protocols

The most compelling evidence supports multicomponent "bundles" addressing multiple aspects of circadian disruption simultaneously:

  1. ABCDEF Bundle: This comprehensive approach includes coordinated awakening and breathing trials, careful sedation selection, delirium assessment and management, early mobility, and family engagement. Implementation has been associated with reduced delirium incidence and improved outcomes (Ely, 2017).
  2. Sleep Promotion Protocols: Systematic reviews have demonstrated that multicomponent sleep protocols incorporating environmental modifications, non-pharmacological sleep aids, and minimization of nighttime disruptions can improve sleep quality and reduce delirium (Hu et al., 2015).

Implementation Strategies and Barriers

Organizational Approaches

  1. Staff Education: Increasing awareness of circadian biology and its importance in critical illness is fundamental to implementation success. Educational programs should target all ICU staff, emphasizing the clinical consequences of circadian disruption and evidence-based interventions (Scott et al., 2019).
  2. Protocol Development: Standardized protocols incorporating circadian considerations into daily care workflows can improve compliance and sustainability. These should address lighting, noise control, medication timing, and minimization of nighttime disruptions (Patel et al., 2014).
  3. Environmental Audits: Regular assessment of ICU light and noise levels can identify opportunities for improvement and monitor intervention effectiveness (Darbyshire & Young, 2013).

Barriers to Implementation

  1. Competing Priorities: In acute critical illness, life-sustaining interventions necessarily take precedence over circadian considerations. However, integrating circadian awareness into standard care can occur without compromising essential treatments.
  2. Resource Limitations: Some interventions, particularly advanced lighting systems, require significant financial investment. Cost-effectiveness analyses suggest potential long-term savings through reduced delirium, shorter ICU stays, and improved outcomes (Zhang et al., 2019).
  3. Workflow Disruption: Changes to established care patterns may initially increase workload or disrupt workflow. Careful implementation planning with stakeholder involvement can mitigate these concerns (Kamdar et al., 2013).

Future Directions

  1. Personalized Chronotherapy: Individual variation in circadian typology (chronotype) suggests potential benefit from personalized approaches. Future research may enable tailoring of interventions based on pre-illness chronotype or real-time circadian markers (Selfridge et al., 2016).
  2. Circadian-Aware Technology: Development of ICU monitoring systems, ventilators, and infusion pumps with circadian considerations built into their design could facilitate integration into routine care (Martinez-Nicolas et al., 2019).
  3. Molecular Chronotherapeutics: Emerging understanding of clock gene function may eventually enable targeted molecular interventions to reset disrupted circadian clocks in critical illness (Zhao et al., 2019).

Conclusion

Circadian rhythm disruption represents a significant yet modifiable contributor to adverse outcomes in critically ill patients. Evidence increasingly supports the implementation of circadian-preserving strategies in ICU settings, including environmental modifications, judicious pharmacological approaches, and chronotherapeutic principles. Multi-component protocols addressing multiple aspects of circadian disruption simultaneously appear most effective. While challenges to implementation exist, increasing awareness of circadian biology among critical care practitioners and continued research into practical, scalable interventions promise to improve outcomes for this vulnerable patient population.

Future research should focus on defining optimal timing and dosing of interventions, identifying patient subpopulations most likely to benefit from targeted chronotherapeutics, and developing practical, cost-effective implementation strategies suitable for diverse ICU settings. As our understanding of the complex interplay between critical illness and circadian biology continues to evolve, circadian rhythm management is likely to become an increasingly important component of comprehensive critical care.

References

Benloucif S, Burgess HJ, Klerman EB, Lewy AJ, Middleton B, Murphy PJ, Parry BL, & Revell VL. (2008). Measuring melatonin in humans. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 4(1), 66-69.

Darbyshire JL, & Young JD. (2013). An investigation of sound levels on intensive care units with reference to the WHO guidelines. Critical Care, 17(5), R187.

Drewry AM, Fuller BM, Bailey TC, & Hotchkiss RS. (2013). Body temperature patterns as a predictor of hospital-acquired sepsis in afebrile adult intensive care unit patients: a case-control study. Critical Care, 17(5), R200.

Ely EW. (2017). The ABCDEF bundle: science and philosophy of how ICU liberation serves patients and families. Critical Care Medicine, 45(2), 321-330.

Ely EW, Shintani A, Truman B, Speroff T, Gordon SM, Harrell FE Jr, Inouye SK, Bernard GR, & Dittus RS. (2004). Delirium as a predictor of mortality in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit. JAMA, 291(14), 1753-1762.

Engwall M, Fridh I, Johansson L, Bergbom I, & Lindahl B. (2015). Lighting, sleep and circadian rhythm: An intervention study in the intensive care unit. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 31(6), 325-335.

Figueiro MG, Steverson B, Heerwagen J, Kampschroer K, Hunter CM, Gonzales K, Plitnick B, & Rea MS. (2018). The impact of daytime light exposures on sleep and mood in office workers. Sleep Health, 4(5), 466-474.

Freedman NS, Gazendam J, Levan L, Pack AI, & Schwab RJ. (2001). Abnormal sleep/wake cycles and the effect of environmental noise on sleep disruption in the intensive care unit. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 163(2), 451-457.

Friese RS. (2008). Sleep and recovery from critical illness and injury: a review of theory, current practice, and future directions. Critical Care Medicine, 36(3), 697-705.

Gusmao-Flores D, Salluh JI, Chalhub RÁ, & Quarantini LC. (2012). The confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) and intensive care delirium screening checklist (ICDSC) for the diagnosis of delirium: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies. Critical Care, 16(4), R115.

Haspel JA, Anafi R, Brown MK, Cermakian N, Depner C, Desplats P, Gelman AE, Haack M, Jelic S, Kim BS, Laposky AD, Lee YC, Mongodin E, Prather AA, Prendergast BJ, Reardon C, Shaw AC, Sengupta S, Szentirmai É, Thakkar M, Walker WE, & Solt LA. (2020). Perfect timing: circadian rhythms, sleep, and immunity - an NIH workshop summary. JCI Insight, 5(1), e131487.

Hatta K, Kishi Y, Wada K, Takeuchi T, Odawara T, Usui C, & Nakamura H. (2014). Preventive effects of ramelteon on delirium: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. JAMA Psychiatry, 71(4), 397-403.

Hu RF, Jiang XY, Chen J, Zeng Z, Chen XY, Li Y, Huining X, & Evans DJ. (2015). Non-pharmacological interventions for sleep promotion in the intensive care unit. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (10), CD008808.

Kamdar BB, King LM, Collop NA, Sakamuri S, Colantuoni E, Neufeld KJ, Bienvenu OJ, Rowden AM, Touradji P, Brower RG, & Needham DM. (2013). The effect of a quality improvement intervention on perceived sleep quality and cognition in a medical ICU. Critical Care Medicine, 41(3), 800-809.

Kondili E, Alexopoulou C, Xirouchaki N, & Georgopoulos D. (2012). Effects of propofol on sleep quality in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a physiological study. Intensive Care Medicine, 38(10), 1640-1646.

Maas MJ, Collet C, de Goeij M, Alkemade A, & Spoorenberg SMC. (2021). The diurnal pattern of salivary cortisol in ICU patients and healthy volunteers. Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, 9(1), 5.

Martinez-Nicolas A, Madrid JA, García FJ, Campos M, Moreno-Casbas MT, Almaida-Pagán PF, Lucas-Sánchez A, & Rol MA. (2019). Circadian monitoring as an aging predictor. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 14075.

McKenna HT, Reiss IK, & Martin DS. (2020). The significance of circadian rhythms and dysrhythmias in critical illness. Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 21(3), 234-243.

Mundigler G, Delle-Karth G, Koreny M, Zehetgruber M, Steindl-Munda P, Marktl W, Ferti L, & Siostrzonek P. (2002). Impaired circadian rhythm of melatonin secretion in sedated critically ill patients with severe sepsis. Critical Care Medicine, 30(3), 536-540.

Nishikimi M, Numaguchi A, Takahashi K, Miyagawa Y, Matsui K, Higashi M, Makishi G, Matsui S, & Matsuda N. (2018). Effect of administration of ramelteon, a melatonin receptor agonist, on the duration of stay in the ICU: a single-center randomized placebo-controlled trial. Critical Care Medicine, 46(7), 1099-1105.

Olofsson K, Alling C, Lundberg D, & Malmros C. (2004). Abolished circadian rhythm of melatonin secretion in sedated and artificially ventilated intensive care patients. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 48(6), 679-684.

Ono H, Taguchi T, Kido Y, Fujino Y, & Doki Y. (2011). The usefulness of bright light therapy for patients after oesophagectomy. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 27(3), 158-166.

Panda S. (2016). Circadian physiology of metabolism. Science, 354(6315), 1008-1015.

Patel J, Baldwin J, Bunting P, & Laha S. (2014). The effect of a multicomponent multidisciplinary bundle of interventions on sleep and delirium in medical and surgical intensive care patients. Anaesthesia, 69(6), 540-549.

Pisani MA, & D'Ambrosio C. (2020). Sleep and delirium in adults who are critically ill: a contemporary review. Chest, 157(4), 977-984.

Pisani MA, Friese RS, Gehlbach BK, Schwab RJ, Weinhouse GL, & Jones SF. (2015). Sleep in the intensive care unit. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 191(7), 731-738.

Portaluppi F, Tiseo R, Smolensky MH, Hermida RC, Ayala DE, & Fabbian F. (2012). Circadian rhythms and cardiovascular health. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 16(2), 151-166.

Sanders RD, & Maze M. (2012). Contribution of sedative-hypnotic agents to delirium via modulation of the sleep pathway. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 59(2), 152-158.

Scheiermann C, Gibbs J, Ince L, & Loudon A. (2018). Clocking in to immunity. Nature Reviews Immunology, 18(7), 423-437.

Schwab KE, Ronish B, Needham DM, To AQ, Martin JL, & Kamdar BB. (2018). Actigraphy to evaluate sleep in the intensive care unit: a systematic review. Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 15(9), 1075-1082.

Scott AJ, Rowse G, & Webb TL. (2019). A practical guide to the systematic implementation of promoting sleep in critical illness. Nursing in Critical Care, 24(6), 317-325.

Selfridge JM, Gotoh T, Schiffhauer S, Liu J, Stauffer PE, Li A, Capelluto DG, & Finkielstein CV. (2016). Chronotherapy: intuitive, sound, founded...but not broadly applied. Drugs, 76(16), 1507-1521.

Simons KS, Laheij RJ, van den Boogaard M, Moviat MA, Paling AJ, Polderman FN, Rozendaal FW, Salet GA, van der Hoeven JG, Pickkers P, & de Jager CP. (2016). Dynamic light application therapy to reduce the incidence and duration of delirium in intensive-care patients: a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 4(3), 194-202.

Sutton EF, Beyl R, Early KS, Cefalu WT, Ravussin E, & Peterson CM. (2018). Early time-restricted feeding improves insulin sensitivity, blood pressure, and oxidative stress even without weight loss in men with prediabetes. Cell Metabolism, 27(6), 1212-1221.

Tahara Y, & Shibata S. (2018). Circadian rhythms of liver physiology and disease: experimental and clinical evidence. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 15(4), 189-201.

Takahashi JS. (2017). Transcriptional architecture of the mammalian circadian clock. Nature Reviews Genetics, 18(3), 164-179.

Thosar SS, Butler MP, & Shea SA. (2018). Role of the circadian system in cardiovascular disease. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 128(6), 2157-2167.

Van Rompaey B, Elseviers MM, Van Drom W, Fromont V, & Jorens PG. (2012). The effect of earplugs during the night on the onset of delirium and sleep perception: a randomized controlled trial in intensive care patients. Critical Care, 16(3), R73.

Vetter C, Dashti HS, Lane JM, Anderson SG, Schernhammer ES, Rutter MK, Saxena R, & Scheer FAJL. (2018). Night shift work, genetic risk, and type 2 diabetes in the UK Biobank. Diabetes Care, 41(4), 762-769.

Weinhouse GL, Schwab RJ, Watson PL, Patil N, Vaccaro B, Pandharipande P, & Ely EW. (2009). Bench-to-bedside review: delirium in ICU patients - importance of sleep deprivation. Critical Care, 13(6), 234.

Zhang J, Lu F, Chen H, Wang R, & Lin L. (2019). A cost-effectiveness analysis of light therapy for hospital-acquired delirium. Journal of Nursing Management, 27(3), 464-470.

Zhao X, Cho H, Yu RT, Atkins AR, Downes M, & Evans RM. (2019). Nuclear receptors rock around the clock. EMBO Reports, 20(5), e47929.